How Otto did not extend his mind,but might have: Dynamic systems theory and social-cultural group selection |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Petru Maior University of Tirgu Mures, Romania;2. Tampere University of Technology, Finland;3. Istanbul University, Turkey;1. Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science, TU Delft, Mekelweg 4, 2628 CD Delft, Netherlands;2. TNO, Kampweg 5, 3769 DE Soesterberg, Netherlands;3. CINOP, Stationsplein 14, 5211 AP Den Bosch, Netherlands;4. ECBO, Stationsplein 14, 5211 AP Den Bosch, Netherlands;1. University of Texas at Austin, United States;2. University of Texas at Arlington, United States |
| |
Abstract: | Proponents of cognitive Situationism argue that the human mind is embodied, embedded in both natural and social-cultural environments and extended creating both extended and distributed cognition. Anti-situationists reject all or some of these claims. I argue that four major objections to extended cognition: (1) the mark of the cognitive, (2) the function-identity fallacy, (3) cognitive bloat, and (4) scientific irrelevance lose much of their sting in the case of distributed cognition, the extension of cognitive agency to a group of cognitive agents, such as a scientific research team. However, I claim that a crucial fifth challenge, that advocates of the extended mind commit the causal-constitution fallacy, has yet to be satisfactorily addressed. I focus on Spyridon Palermos’ use of dynamic systems theory to refute this charge and I argue that his appeal to dynamic systems theory as a way of understanding system-constitution fails. Instead, I suggest a social-cultural group selection hypothesis for understanding system-constitution. But, I leave it for another day to elaborate that hypothesis’ empirical plausibility. |
| |
Keywords: | Causal-constitution fallacy Cultural group selection Distributed cognition Dynamical systems theory Extended cognition: Situated cognition |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|