| 技术哲学的两种经验转向及其问题 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 潘恩荣.技术哲学的两种经验转向及其问题[J].哲学研究,2012(1):98-105,128. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 潘恩荣 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 浙江大学马克思主义学院;浙江大学语言与认知研究中心 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家自然科学基金项目“面向对象的改进型物-场模型研究”(编号50905158);浙江省哲学社会科学规划课题“当代技术哲学经验转向纲领研究”(编号10CGZX06YBQ);教育部人文社会科学研究项目“工程伦理研究的经验转向”(编号11YJCZH217);浙江大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(编号0009663)资助 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 当代技术哲学的一个重要发展趋势是在经验转向(empirical turn)和伦理转向(ethical turn)的基础上实现技术哲学的"第三次转向",以便整合前两次转向的优势。(Verbeek,p.51)事实上,经
|
| 关 键 词： | 技术哲学 经验转向 人工物 技术与社会 科学技术 概念框架 研究进路 面向工程 现代技术 面向社会 |
Two Empirical Turns of Philosophy of Technology and their Problems |
| |
| Pan En-rong.Two Empirical Turns of Philosophy of Technology and their Problems[J].Philosophical Researches,2012(1):98-105,128. |
| |
| Authors: | Pan En-rong |
| |
| Institution: | Pan En-rong |
| |
| Abstract: | Based on the dualist conceptual framework of"Technology-Society",two types of empirical turn were identified as"Empirical Turn".However,there is the ineradicable risk of departure between these two types of modern philosophy of technology that developed according to these two empirical turns.In this paper,"Technology-Society"is transformed from macroscopic level to microscopic level based on the perspective of the internal approach of philosophy of technology.Then,it gets the new understandings about two types of the empirical turn and the philosophy of technology by the steps of objectification,departure and coherence of the transformation method of the dualist conceptual framework.Such understandings explain that the two types of modern philosophy of technology,on the one hand,will develop their research independently to each other and,on the other hand,will not only remove the risk of departure but also support to each other. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
|
