矛盾年龄偏见量表在中国大学生群体中的修订及信效度检验

目的：修订矛盾年龄偏见量表(the Ambivalent Ageism Scale, AAS),并在中国大学生群体中进行信、效度检验。方法：对1182名大学生施测AAS中文翻译版，探索并验证其因子结构，分析信、效度和测量等值性。其中347人还完成老化知识量表(FAQ)和容纳他人量表(AOS),用以检验AAS中文版的校标关联效度。另有74人在4周后重测AAS中文版。结果：AAS中文修订版包含认知帮助/保护、不想要的帮助和敌意年龄偏见三因子，总量表和各维度的Cronbach’s α系数依次为0.83、0.80、0.85、0.76,重测信度依次为0.78、0.62、0.78、0.71。AAS中文修订版及各维度与FAQ和AOS负相关(r=-0.23～-0.48,ps<0.001)。验证因素分析表明AAS中文修订版的拟合良好(χ²/df=3.51,CFI=0.96,TLI=0.94,RMSEA=0.07,SRMR=0.05)。且该量表跨性别形态、弱等值、部分强等值和部分严格测量等值成立。结论：修订后的矛盾年龄偏见量表(AAS)中文版的信、效度良好，具备跨性别的测量部分...

Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Ambivalent Ageism Scale in Chinese Undergraduates

Objective:to test the reliability and validity the Ambivalent Ageism Scale(AAS)in Chinese undergraduates.Methods:1182 undergraduates completed AAS.The criteria-related validity was tested with the Acceptance of Others Scale(AOS)and Facts on Aging Quiz(FAQ)by 347 students.After 4 weeks,74 students were tested for test-retest reliability.Results:the Chinese Version of AAS contains three factors:cognitive assistance/protection,unwanted help,and hostile ageism.The internal consistency reliabilities of them were 0.83,0.80,0.85 and 0.76,and the test-retest reliabilities were 0.78,0.62,0.78,and 0.71.The AAS and three factors were correlated with the acceptance of others and the facts on aging.The CFA proved that AAS had good fit structure.In addition,the configural,metric,scalar and partial strict invariance of the model across gender was verified.Conclusion:The Chinese version of the Ambivalent Ageism Scale has good reliability and validity,and the results of AAS can be contrasted across genders of Chinese undergraduate.