首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Supporting Universal Prevention Programs: A Two-Phased Coaching Model
Authors:Kimberly D. Becker  Dana Darney  Celene Domitrovich  Jennifer Pitchford Keperling  Nicholas S. Ialongo
Affiliation:1. Department of Psychiatry, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA
2. Department of Educational School, and Counseling Psychology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
3. Prevention Research Center, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
4. Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
Abstract:Schools are adopting evidence-based programs designed to enhance students’ emotional and behavioral competencies at increasing rates (Hemmeter et al. in Early Child Res Q 26:96–109, 2011). At the same time, teachers express the need for increased support surrounding implementation of these evidence-based programs (Carter and Van Norman in Early Child Educ 38:279–288, 2010). Ongoing professional development in the form of coaching may enhance teacher skills and implementation (Noell et al. in School Psychol Rev 34:87–106, 2005; Stormont et al. 2012). There exists a need for a coaching model that can be applied to a variety of teacher skill levels and one that guides coach decision-making about how best to support teachers. This article provides a detailed account of a two-phased coaching model with empirical support developed and tested with coaches and teachers in urban schools (Becker et al. 2013). In the initial universal coaching phase, all teachers receive the same coaching elements regardless of their skill level. Then, in the tailored coaching phase, coaching varies according to the strengths and needs of each teacher. Specifically, more intensive coaching strategies are used only with teachers who need additional coaching supports, whereas other teachers receive just enough support to consolidate and maintain their strong implementation. Examples of how coaches used the two-phased coaching model when working with teachers who were implementing two universal prevention programs (i.e., the PATHS® curriculum and PAX Good Behavior Game [PAX GBG]) provide illustrations of the application of this model. The potential reach of this coaching model extends to other school-based programs as well as other settings in which coaches partner with interventionists to implement evidence-based programs.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号