首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

Which Is Better: Simultaneous or Sequential Choice?
引用本文:Read D,Antonides G,van den Ouden L,Trienekens H. Which Is Better: Simultaneous or Sequential Choice?[J]. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 2001, 84(1): 54-70. DOI: 10.1006/obhd.2000.2917
作者姓名:Read D  Antonides G  van den Ouden L  Trienekens H
摘    要:

收稿时间:1998-09-04

Which Is Better: Simultaneous or Sequential Choice?
Read D,Antonides G,van den Ouden L,Trienekens H. Which Is Better: Simultaneous or Sequential Choice?[J]. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 2001, 84(1): 54-70. DOI: 10.1006/obhd.2000.2917
Authors:Read D  Antonides G  van den Ouden L  Trienekens H
Affiliation:Leeds University Business School, Leeds, United Kingdom
Abstract:The term "diversification bias" refers to the tendency for people to take more variety when choosing several items simultaneously than when choosing them sequentially. In this article, we investigate whether this really is a bias by measuring evaluations of sets chosen simultaneously or sequentially. In Experiment 1 participants made two choices between audio tracks for consecutive consumption. Participants liked low-variety sets most and were more likely to choose high-variety sets in simultaneous choice. In Experiment 2 participants chose between three gambles which varied in the probability of winning and their expected value. Again, simultaneous choices seemed worse than sequential ones: The simultaneous-choice groups took far more low expected value gambles than did sequential-choice subjects and rated their enjoyment as lower. We conclude that simultaneous choice often leads to outcomes that are worse than sequential choice and discuss the circumstances when this is likely to be true.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect PubMed 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号