Denoising forced‐choice detection data

Observers in a two‐alternative forced‐choice (2AFC) detection task face the need to produce a response at random (a guess) on trials in which neither presentation appeared to display a stimulus. Observers could alternatively be instructed to use a ‘guess’ key on those trials, a key that would produce a random guess and would also record the resultant correct or wrong response as emanating from a computer‐generated guess. A simulation study shows that ‘denoising’ 2AFC data with information regarding which responses are a result of guesses yields estimates of detection threshold and spread of the psychometric function that are far more precise than those obtained in the absence of this information, and parallel the precision of estimates obtained with yes–no tasks running for the same number of trials. Simulations also show that partial compliance with the instructions to use the ‘guess’ key reduces the quality of the estimates, which nevertheless continue to be more precise than those obtained from conventional 2AFC data if the observers are still moderately compliant. An empirical study testing the validity of simulation results showed that denoised 2AFC estimates of spread were clearly superior to conventional 2AFC estimates and similar to yes–no estimates, but variations in threshold across observers and across sessions hid the benefits of denoising for threshold estimation. The empirical study also proved the feasibility of using a ‘guess’ key in addition to the conventional response keys defined in 2AFC tasks.