Of Coals and Eskimos: Reply to Commentary |
| |
| Authors: | Juan Tubert-Oklander MD |
| |
| Institution: | Training and Supervising Analyst at the Institute of the Mexican Psychoanalytical Association , member of the Argentine Psychoanalytic Association and the International Association for Relational Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy. He is author (with Reyna Hernández de Tubert) of Operative Groups: The Latin-American Approach to Group Analysis. |
| |
| Abstract: | I first point out that there are similarities between the Fiscalini and me, and then I try to clarify some differences. Fiscalini suggests that I may be “inadvertently taking coals to Newcastle,” in arguing in favor of a well-known concept. Coming from a Freudian orthodox background, I have learned to substantiate every step of my reasoning on nonorthodox concepts. This sort of clarification may be useful, even for those who share my point of view. One misunderstanding is that Fiscalini classifies me as an advocate of participant observation, whereas I identify with coparticipation. After suggesting some possible explanation for this difference, I develop some of my own ideas about psychoanalysis considered in terms of analogical hermeneutics, the paradox of being both individual and communal at the same time, and the need to include the social and political context in the analytic inquiry, and transcend the pseudo-opposition between interpretation and experience. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
|
|
