| Abstract: | Guinea pigs were fed a solution which had a distinctive taste or appearance and one hr later were made sick by an intraperitoneal injection of lithium chloride. Upon recovery from the effects of sickness the animals in Expt 1 showed aversions to a weak tasting, sour solution or to a strong tasting, sweet solution. Animals in Expt 2 formed aversions to tap water which had been colored either red or blue while those in Expt 3 formed aversions to tap water which had been presented in either red or blue drinking tubes. When, however, sickness was not contingent upon drinking a distinctive solution there was no sign of decreased consumption of the test solutions. The differences between the outcome of the Expts 2 and 3 and those typically found with rats can be explained by the fact that guinea pigs appear to use both taste and visual cues in food selection whereas rats primarily use only gustatory cues. Since vision in the guinea pig is no more acute than vision in rats and substantially more limited than vision in other animals who have formed aversions to visual cues, the results of Expts 2 and 3 also suggest that the ability to form poison-based aversions to visual cues is not totally dependent upon a highly developed visual system. |
