Earlier detection facilitates skilled responses to deceptive actions |
| |
| Institution: | 1. School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, United Kingdom;2. School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, United Kingdom;1. Cognitive Neuroscience of Perception and Action, Faculty of Psychology, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany;2. Neuromotor Behavior Laboratory, Department of Psychology and Sport Science, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Giessen, Germany;3. Department of Psychology and Sports Sciences, Goethe-University Frankfurt/Main, Germany;1. CIPER, Faculdade de Motricidade Humana, Universidade de Lisboa, Cruz Quebrada Dafundo, Portugal;2. CIMOSM, Instituto Superior de Engenharia de Lisboa, Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa, 1959-007 Lisboa, Portugal;1. Western Kentucky University, 1906 College Heights Blvd. Bowling Green, KY 42101-1089, United States;2. University of Tennessee, Knoxville, 1122 Volunteer Boulevard Knoxville, TN 37996-3400, United States;3. Auburn University, 3084 Haley Center Auburn, AL 36849-5218, United States;1. Department of Physical Education, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea;2. Department of Health and Kinesiology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA;3. Department of Sports Science, Korean Institute of Sports Science, Seoul, South Korea;4. Institute of Sports Science, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea;5. Advanced Institute of Convergence Science, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea;2. Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany |
| |
| Abstract: | High-skilled and recreational rugby players were placed in a semi-immersive CAREN Lab environment to examine susceptibility to, and detection of, deception. To achieve this, a broad window of seven occlusion times was used in which participants responded to life-size video clips of an opposing player ‘cutting’ left or right, with or without a deceptive sidestep. Participants made full-body responses to ‘intercept’ the player and gave a verbal judgement of the opponent's final running direction. Response kinematic and kinetic data were recorded using three-dimensional motion capture cameras and force plates, respectively. Based on response accuracy, the results were separated into deception susceptibility and deception detection windows then signal detection analysis was used to calculate indices of discriminability between genuine and deceptive actions (d’) and judgement bias (c). Analysis revealed that high-skilled and low-skilled players were similarly susceptible to deception; however, high-skilled players detected deception earlier in the action sequence, which enabled them to make more effective behavioural responses to deceptive actions. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
