Relevance and digressions in argumentative discussion: A pragmatic approach |
| |
Authors: | Scott Jacobs Sally Jackson |
| |
Institution: | (1) Department of Communication, University of Arizona, 85718 Tucson, AZ, U.S.A. |
| |
Abstract: | Digressions in argumentative discussion are a kind of failure of relevance. Examination of what actual cases look like reveals several properties of argumentative relevance: (1) The informational relevance of propositions to the truth value of a conclusion should be distinguished from the pragmatic relevance of argumentative acts to the task of resolving a disagreement. (2) Pragmatic irrelevance is a collaborative phenomenon. It does not just short-circuit reasoning; it encourages a failure to take up the demands of an argumentative task. (3) Pragmatic irrelevance can occur not simply by the absence of a connection between what is said and some standpoint in dispute, but also by the presence of a connection between what is said and a competing use of the information. (4) Pragmatic relevance must be accomplished through communicative action. |
| |
Keywords: | Argument coherence conversation analysis dialogue digression discourse pragmatics relevance speech acts |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |