Lessons learned from pedestrian-driver communication and yielding patterns |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Texas A&M University, 3135 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843-3135, United States;2. Texas A&M Transportation Institute, 3500 NW Loop 410, San Antonio, TX 78229, United States;1. Université de Bretagne-Sud, France;2. Cerema, France;1. UNC Highway Safety Research Center, 730 MLK, Jr. Blvd., Ste 300, CB#3430, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3430, United States;2. Department of Epidemiology, Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina, CVS Bldg., Ste 500, CB# 7505, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7505, United States;3. Department of City and Regional Planning, University of California, Berkeley, 230 Wurster Hall #1820, Berkeley, CA 94720-1820, United States;4. Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina, CVS Bldg., Ste 306, CB# 8050, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-8050, United States;5. Department of Health Behavior, University of North Carolina, 358A Rosenau Hall, CB#7440, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7440, United States;6. Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina, 2104B McGavran-Greenberg Hall, CB# 7435, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7435, United States |
| |
Abstract: | Understanding the hidden patterns of tacit communication between drivers and pedestrians is crucial for improving pedestrian safety. However, this type of communication is a result of the psychological processes of both pedestrians and drivers, which are very difficult to understand thoroughly. This study utilizes a naturalistic field study dataset and explores the hidden patterns from successful and failed communication events using a pattern recognition method known as Taxicab Correspondence Analysis (TCA). The successful communication scenarios indicate the combinations of variable attributes such as eye contact, facial expression, the assertion of crossing, and effective traffic control devices are strongly associated with successful scenarios. The patterns for failed scenarios are most likely to be on the roadway with a relatively higher speed limit (e.g., 35 mph) and a relatively lower speed limit (e.g., 15 mph) under different conditions. On roadways with a higher speed limit, the failed scenarios are highly associated with passive and undecisive pedestrians, pedestrians far away from the crosswalk, regardless of pedestrian-driver eye contact and facial expression of the pedestrians. Instead of waiting for pedestrians to making a crossing decision, overspeeding drivers are more likely to speed up and pass the crosswalk. On roadways with a lower speed limit, the failed scenarios are often associated with distracted pedestrians, vehicles having the right of way, and the absence of effective traffic control devices. These findings could help transportation agencies identify appropriate countermeasures to reduce pedestrian crashes. The findings on driver-pedestrian communication patterns could provide scopes for improvement in computer vision-based algorithms designed for autonomous vehicle industries. |
| |
Keywords: | Pedestrian driver interaction Naturalistic driving Tacit communication Pattern recognition Correspondence analysis CA" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" k0035" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" Correspondence Analysis TCA" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" k0045" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" Taxicab Correspondence Analysis DAS" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" k0055" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" data acquisition system VI" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" k0065" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" variable importance VIP" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" k0075" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" variable importance plot RF" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" k0085" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" random forest GB" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" k0095" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" gradient boosting ROW" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" k0105" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" right of way |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|