Time to update our suggestibility scales |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Escola de Educação Física, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil;2. Dept. Physical Therapy, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel;3. Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark;4. Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel |
| |
Abstract: | Oakley and colleagues (2021) suggest that a classic scale – HGSHS:A, aiming to measure hypnotic suggestibility – can be used to measure direct verbal suggestibility (DVS). According to the authors, DVS is a trait that can be measured both with and without hypnosis. I find this initiative highly welcome. However, I wish to give several examples why it is time to develop entirely new scales instead. Rather than trying to explain more phenomena with a single scale or concept, researchers should take a cue from research that points to a far more nuanced picture of suggestibility than a construct like DVS allows. There may be no single, unified phenomenon that can be measured with a single scale. The old, time-tested scales should be treated neither as sacred nor final. They require up-to-date, critical analysis of what exactly they measure, with an eye to how they can be further improved. |
| |
Keywords: | Suggestibility Automaticity Hypnosis Ideomotor suggestion |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|