On the validity of remember-know judgments: evidence from think aloud protocols |
| |
Authors: | McCabe David P Geraci Lisa Boman Jeffrey K Sensenig Amanda E Rhodes Matthew G |
| |
Affiliation: | aDepartment of Psychology, Colorado State University, United States;bDepartment of Psychology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-4235, United States;cDepartment of Psychology, Bluffton University, United States |
| |
Abstract: | The use of remember–know judgments to assess subjective experience associated with memory retrieval, or as measures of recollection and familiarity processes, has been controversial. In the current study we had participants think aloud during study and provide verbal reports at test for remember–know and confidence (i.e., sure–probably) judgments. Results indicated that the vast majority of remember judgments for studied items were associated with recollection from study (87%), but this correspondence was less likely for high-confidence judgments (72%). Instead, high-confidence judgments were more likely than remember judgments to be associated with incorrect recollection and a lack of recollection. Know judgments were typically associated with a lack of recollection (62%), but still included recollection from the study context (33%). Thus, although remember judgments provided fairly accurate assessments of retrieval including contextual details, know judgments did not provide accurate assessments of retrieval lacking contextual details. |
| |
Keywords: | Remember&ndash know Autonoetic Noetic Recollection Familiarity Confidence Think-aloud |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect PubMed 等数据库收录! |
|