Early Termination from Couple Therapy in a Naturalistic Setting: The Role of Therapeutic Mandates and Romantic Attachment |
| |
Authors: | Josianne Mondor Stéphane Sabourin John Wright Hélène Poitras-Wright Pierre McDuff Yvan Lussier |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Centre de consultation conjugale et familiale Poitras-Wright-C?té, Montréal, Canada 2. School of Psychology, Université Laval, 2325, rue des Bibliothèques, Québec, G1V 0A6, Canada 3. Department of Psychology, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada 4. Department of Psychology, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, Canada
|
| |
Abstract: | Drawing on a series of 141 couple therapy cases, the main goal of the present study was to determine whether romantic attachment, pre-treatment relationship distress and therapeutic mandates (i.e., reduction of couple distress or ambivalence resolution) are prognostic indicators of early termination. Couples completed the Dyadic Adjustment Scale (Spanier 1976) and the Experiences in Close Relationships Questionnaire (Brennan et al. 1998) at intake, whereas therapists filled in the Classification of Therapeutic Mandates (Poitras-Wright and St-Père 2004) after the 4th session. Results showed that an ambivalence resolution mandate, elevated couple distress and higher levels of attachment anxiety were associated with early termination. The implications of these findings to further understand early termination in couple therapy are discussed. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|