Method Decisions: Quantitative and Qualitative Inquiry in the Study of Religious Phenomena |
| |
Authors: | Brent D. Slife Brent S. Melling |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Psychology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, 84602, USA
|
| |
Abstract: | The conceptual and procedural differences between quantitative and qualitative methods have led many researchers to realize that some methodologies are better suited for studying some phenomena over other phenomena. However, practical guidelines for making these method decisions have yet to be developed. The primary purpose of this paper is to begin to provide such guidelines, especially in the study of religious phenomena. We first discuss the common mistake in Western psychology of considering methods as mere procedures rather than as the outcomes of different interpretations of the world. We then compare five features of a general quantitative interpretation with five features of a general qualitative interpretation. From this comparison, the advantages and disadvantages of each method strategy are discussed. Knowledge of these advantages and disadvantages allows methods to be better matched to the religious phenomena being studied. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|