Stimulus design is an obstacle course: 560 matched literal and metaphorical sentences for testing neural hypotheses about metaphor |
| |
Authors: | Eileen R Cardillo Gwenda L Schmidt Alexander Kranjec Anjan Chatterjee |
| |
Institution: | 1.Department of Neurology,University of Pennsylvania,Philadelphia |
| |
Abstract: | Despite the ubiquity and importance of metaphor in thought and communication, its neural mediation remains elusive. We suggest
that this uncertainty reflects, in part, stimuli that have not been designed with recent conceptual frameworks in mind or
that have been hampered by inadvertent differences between metaphoric and literal conditions. In this article, we begin addressing
these shortcomings by developing a large, flexible, extensively normed, and theoretically motivated set of metaphoric and
literal sentences. On the basis of the results of three norming studies, we provide 280 pairs of closely matched metaphoric
and literal sentences that are characterized along 10 dimensions: length, frequency, concreteness, familiarity, naturalness,
imageability, figurativeness, interpretability, valence, and valence judgment reaction time. In addition to allowing for control
of these potentially confounding lexical and sentential factors, these stimuli are designed to address questions about the
role of novelty, metaphor type, and sensory-motor grounding in determining the neural basis of metaphor comprehension. Supplemental
data for this article may be downloaded from http://brm.psychonomic-journals .org/content/supplemental. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|