首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Part-list cuing as instructed retrieval inhibition
Authors:Karl?-Heinz?B?uml  author-information"  >  author-information__contact u-icon-before"  >  mailto:karl-heinz.baeuml@psychologie.uni-regensburg.de"   title="  karl-heinz.baeuml@psychologie.uni-regensburg.de"   itemprop="  email"   data-track="  click"   data-track-action="  Email author"   data-track-label="  "  >Email author,Alp?Aslan
Affiliation:Department of Experimental Psychology, Regensburg University, Regensburg, Germany. karl-heinz.baeuml@psychologie.uni-regensburg.de
Abstract:The reexposure of a subset of learned material as a retrieval cue can impair recall of the remaining material. Like part-list relearning--the reexposure of learned material for additional learning--this part-list cuing is often assumed to be the result of output order biases at test, caused by the increased strength of the reexposed material. We directly compared the effects of cuing and relearning when controlling for output order biases. In addition, we compared the two forms of reexposure with the effect of part-list retrieval. Both part-list cuing and part-list retrieval reduced recall performance for the remaining material. By contrast, part-list relearning had no such detrimental effect. These results indicate that the effect of reexposure depends on whether material is reexposed as a cue or for relearning, suggesting that part-list cuing reflects an instructional effect. Evidence is provided that part-list cuing leads to instructed covert retrieval of cue items and causes retrieval inhibition of noncue items, similar to how overt retrieval inhibits nonretrieved items.
Keywords:
本文献已被 PubMed SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号