The Calgary semantic decision project: concrete/abstract decision data for 10,000 English words |
| |
Authors: | Penny M. Pexman Alison Heard Ellen Lloyd Melvin J. Yap |
| |
Affiliation: | 1.Department of Psychology,University of Calgary,Calgary,Canada;2.National University of Singapore,Singapore,Singapore |
| |
Abstract: | Psycholinguistic research has been advanced by the development of word recognition megastudies. For instance, the English Lexicon Project (Balota et al., 2007) provides researchers with access to naming and lexical-decision latencies for over 40,000 words. In the present work, we extended the megastudy approach to a task that emphasizes semantic processing. Using a concrete/abstract semantic decision (i.e., does the word refer to something concrete or abstract?), we collected decision latencies and accuracy rates for 10,000 English words. The stimuli were concrete and abstract words selected from Brysbaert, Warriner, and Kuperman’s (2013) comprehensive list of concreteness ratings. In total, 321 participants provided responses to 1,000 words each. Whereas semantic effects tend to be quite modest in naming and lexical decision studies, analyses of the concrete/abstract semantic decision responses show that a substantial proportion of variance can be explained by semantic variables. The item-level and trial-level data will be useful for other researchers interested in the semantic processing of concrete and abstract words. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|