Recency discrimination predicted from absolute lag judgments

An experiment is described which tests the plausibility of the assumption that two-alternative forced-choice (2AFC) recency discrimination is based on an independent lag estimate of each item. 39 Ss made absolute recency judgments for items (common nouns) at varying lag intervals while an independent group of 74 Ss made 2AFC judgments for pairs of items at comparable lag combinations. It was found that the absolute judgment data generated accurate predictions of 2AFC performance.