Stereopsis with opposite contrast contours |
| |
Authors: | Lloyd Kaufman Colin B. Pitblado |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Psychology, Portland State College, 97207, Portland, Oregon
|
| |
Abstract: | The effects of incidental stimuli, defined as visual stimuli not under verbal control, upon a selection task were observed as a function of feedback contingency. Ss judged letter pairs to be valid or invalid completions of preceding letter parts. During the presentation of the letter parts, the response pair or an alternative pair of letters was intermittently presented at a threshold value individually determined for each S. One group of Ss received a light feedback of performance contingent upon responding to the incidental stimuli; whereas a second group received a random noncontingent feedback. The results indicated: (a) both groups responded to the incidental stimuli; (b) feedback contingency had no effect on frequency of responding to the incidental stimuli; (c) frequency of responding to the incidental stimuli remained constant over 32 trials. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|