首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Sex bias and language
Authors:Erica Wise  Janet Rafferty
Affiliation:(1) Department of Psychology, Southern Illinois University, 62901 Carbondale, Illinois
Abstract:Recent research has suggested that in certain contexts male terms may fail to be gender neutral (Moulton, Robinson, & Elias, 1978). Stricker (1977) has proposed that even explicitly generic terms such as ldquoadultrdquo and ldquopersonrdquo may not be gender neutral. The conclusions of the highly controversial and influential Broverman, Vogel, Broverman, Clarkson, and Rosenkrantz (1970) study were based directly on the assumption that ldquoadultrdquo is a gender-neutral term. The present study consisted of a modified replication of the Broverman et al. study followed by an addendum that asked subjects in the ldquogender-neutralrdquo condition to indicate whether they had thought of a neutral, male, or female stimulus person. As predicted, subjects did not tend to think of a neutral stimulus person. The implications of this finding for sex-role stereotype research as well as for ldquoguidlines for nonsexist languagerdquo are discussed.This article is based on a master's thesis completed at Southern Illinois University by the first author.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号