首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Hidden Agendas and the Learning-Earning Controversy: A Reply to Robert J. Nash and Kenneth P. Saurman
Authors:Mark A Stoler  Jennie Versteeg Stoler
Abstract:Student personnel administrators have a vital role to play in the university as facilitators and counselors, but they should not attempt to be “comprehensivists” or “meaning makers.” The Nash-Saurman emphasis on such roles, and on “personal meaning” in higher education, misrepresents the activities of faculty members and the primary mission of the university and invites continued dilution of academic rigor. Such emphases also reflect a continuation of, rather than a break with, the marketplace mentality in higher education and constitute a politically self-serving position on the part of professional educators.
Keywords:
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号