Assessment of human obesity: The measurement of body composition |
| |
Authors: | Michael J. Mahoney B. Kathryn Mahoney Todd Rogers Margret K. Straw |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Department of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, 16802 University Park, Pennsylvania;(2) Department of Psychology, Roosevelt University, 60605 Chicago, Illinois |
| |
Abstract: | The most common methods of assessing degree of obesity in humans are reviewed. These include anthropometry, somatotyping, bodyweight, skinfold calipering, densitometry, and several nondensitometric procedures. The evidence suggests that bodyweight may often be an unreliable and invalid index of obesity. The parameters influencing its inaccuracy are discussed. These include age, height, sex, muscularity, and degree of obesity or amount of recent weight loss. The most reliable and valid measures of human bodyfat are generally the most complicated and impractical. Compromise assessment procedures involving nonintrusive measurement of subcutaneous fat and selected anthropometric dimensions may offer an incomplete but welcome improvement over sole reliance on bodyweight as an index of obesity. |
| |
Keywords: | obesity anthropometry somatotyping bodyweight skinfold calipering densitometry |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|