Role of nonreinforcement in the fixed-interval performance of pigeons

Fixed-interval (FI) schedules have been used extensively to study timing abilities. In FI schedules, animals typically show higher response rates immediately after nonreinforced (N) cycles rather than reinforced (R) cycles (the reinforcement-omission effect), and they exhibit the highest rate approximately at the time when the reinforcer is scheduled to occur (peak performance). The present experiments were designed to determine the extent to which factors other than timing contribute significantly to these two learning phenomena. Pigeons were trained in an FI 16-sec schedule in which half the cycles were R and half were N. When successive cycles were separated by a 2-sec interval, responding early in the FI interval was higher after an N cycle than after an R cycle. This reinforcement-omission effect was eliminated when the interval between cycles was increased to 12 sec, because of an increase in performance after R cycles. In addition, timing of the 16-sec interval was assessed by interpolating 32-sec test cycles (all N cycles) at two rates—either 1 test cycle every other session, or 25 test cycles per session. Peak performance, presumably indexing the animal’s ability to time the 16-sec interval, emerged only with 25 test cycles per day, but not with 1 test cycle every other day, despite extensive training with the target, 16-sec-long interval. These results suggest that transient demotivation and time-based discrimination contribute significantly to the reinforcement-omission effect and peak performance, respectively.