Power and overconfident decision-making |
| |
Authors: | Nathanael J. Fast Niro Sivanathan Nicole D. Mayer Adam D. Galinsky |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Management and Organization, Marshall School of Business, University of Southern California, United States;2. Department of Organisational Behaviour, London Business School, UK;3. Department of Psychology, University of Illinois, Chicago, United States;4. Department of Management and Organizations, Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University, United States |
| |
Abstract: | Five experiments demonstrate that experiencing power leads to overconfident decision-making. Using multiple instantiations of power, including an episodic recall task (Experiments 1–3), a measure of work-related power (Experiment 4), and assignment to high- and low-power roles (Experiment 5), power produced overconfident decisions that generated monetary losses for the powerful. The current findings, through both mediation and moderation, also highlight the central role that the sense of power plays in producing these decision-making tendencies. First, sense of power, but not mood, mediated the link between power and overconfidence (Experiment 3). Second, the link between power and overconfidence was severed when access to power was not salient to the powerful (Experiment 4) and when the powerful were made to feel personally incompetent in their domain of power (Experiment 5). These findings indicate that only when objective power leads people to feel subjectively powerful does it produce overconfident decision-making. |
| |
Keywords: | Power Overconfidence Overprecision Decision-making Positive illusions Hubris Sense of power |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|