The Social Authority of Paradigms as Group Commitments: Rehabilitating Kuhn with Recent Social Philosophy |
| |
Authors: | William Rehg |
| |
Institution: | 1. Department of Philosophy, Saint Louis University, 3800 Lindell Blvd., St. Louis, MO, 63108, USA
|
| |
Abstract: | By linking the conceptual and social dynamics of change in science, Kuhn’s Structure of Scientific Revolutions proved tremendously fruitful for research in science studies. But Kuhn’s idea of incommensurability provoked strong criticism from philosophers of science. In this essay I show how Raimo Tuomela’s Philosophy of Sociality illuminates and strengthens Kuhn’s model of scientific change. After recalling the central features and problems of Kuhn’s model, I introduce Tuomela’s approach. I then show (a) how Tuomela’s conception of group ethos aligns with Kuhn’s notion of paradigms as group commitments, and (b) how Tuomela’s distinction between I-mode and we-mode forms of collective intentionality can capture the shifting paradigmatic commitments in Kuhn’s model of change as a cycle of normal and revolutionary science. But Tuomela’s analysis does not rely on meaning holism, and thus does not involve the problematic notion of incommensurability that burdened Kuhn’s analysis. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|