首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Acute effects of foam rolling on passive stiffness,stretch sensation and fascial sliding: A randomized controlled trial
Institution:1. REMOSS Research Group, Lifesaving and Motor Skill, Faculty of Education and Sport Sciences, University of Vigo, Pontevedra, Spain;2. CLINURSID Research Group, Psychiatry, Radiology and Public Health Department, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain;3. Institute of Research of Santiago (IDIS), Spain;4. International Drowning Research Alliance–IDRA, Río de Janeiro, Brazil;5. Faculty Padre Ossó, University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain;6. Faculty of Educational Sciences, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain;1. Department of Exercise Physiology, Faculty of Physical Education and Sports Science, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran;2. Escola Superior Desporto e Lazer, Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo, Rua Escola Industrial e Comercial de Nun’Álvares, 4900-347, Viana do Castelo, Portugal;3. Instituto de Telecomunicações, Delegação da Covilhã, Lisboa 1049-001, Portugal
Abstract:PurposeFoam Rolling (FR), aims to mimic the effects of manual therapy and tackle dysfunctions of the skeletal muscle and connective tissue. It has been shown to induce improvements in flexibility, but the underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. The aim of the present study was to further elucidate the acute, systemic and tissue-specific responses evoked by FR.MethodsIn a crossover study, 16 (34 ± 6y, 6f) participants received all of the following interventions in a random order: a) 2 × 60 seconds of FR at the anterior thigh, b) 2 × 60 seconds of passive static stretching of the anterior thigh (SS), and c) no intervention (CON). Maximal active and passive knee flexion range of motion (ROM), passive stiffness, sliding of fascial layers, as well as knee flexion angle of first subjectively perceived stretch sensation (FSS) were evaluated before and directly after each intervention.ResultsFlexibility increased only after, FR (active (+1.8 ± 1.9%) and passive ROM (+3.4 ± 2.7%), p = .006, respectively) and SS (passive ROM (+3.2 ± 3.5%), p = .002). Angle of FSS was altered following FR (+4.3° (95% CI: 1.4°–7.2°)) and SS (+6.7° (3.7°–9.6°)), while tissue stiffness remained unchanged after any intervention compared to baseline. Movement of the deepest layer (−5.7 mm (−11.3 mm to −0.1 mm)) as well as intrafascial sliding between deep and superficial layer (−4.9 mm (−9.mm to −0.7 mm)) decreased only after FR.ConclusionFR improved knee flexion ROM without altering passive stiffness, but modified the perception of stretch as well as the mobility of the deep layer of the fascia lata. The mechanisms leading to altered fascial sliding merit further investigation.
Keywords:Foam rolling  Stretching  Flexibility  Connective tissue  Myofascial release
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号