Critical Discussion |
| |
Authors: | Hans-Johann Glock |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) St. Catherine's College, OX1 3UJ Oxford, UK |
| |
Abstract: | Conclusion v. Savigny's commentary is a remarkable achievement and essential reading for all scholars of the Investigations. It brings to the exegetical enterprise something new and important — the challenge of an immanent approach and the tool of German philology. However, some of the potential gains may be lost by his leitmotiv of a tight master-scheme. In my view this central theses scheme presses Wittgenstein's multifaceted masterpiece into an unsuitable Procrustean bed and tends to impoverish v. Savigny's account. Nevertheless there remains the palatable pattern-recipe (for me partly spoiled by an overdose of community-views). Most importantly, v. Savigny approaches most of the material in an innovative and illuminating way. He provides good reasons for questioning, although not necessarily overturning, many key claims of recent scholarship. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|