| 四组中国被试的归因在维度上相对位置的评定 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 郭德俊,张必隐.四组中国被试的归因在维度上相对位置的评定[J].心理科学,1993(3). |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 郭德俊 张必隐 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 北京师范大学心理系
(郭德俊)，北京师范大学心理系(张必隐) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 本文研究了中国被试对十项归因(心境、技巧、知识、机会、努力、帮助、能力、任务、偏好和运气)在五个维度(基源性、稳定性、控制性、预见性和普遍性)上相对位置的评定。并与钱德拉等人(Cbandler & Spies,1984),用美国被试所得的结果进行了比较。实验结果表明中国被试与美国被试评定的一致性达62%。此外,没有一项归因的评定是在维度的极端等极(1.0-2.0或6.0-7.0)。
|
| 关 键 词： | 归因 维度 评定 |
THE SEMANTIC DIFFERENTIAL PLACEMENT OF ATTRIBUTIONS AND DIMENSIONS IN FOUR DIFFERENT GROUPS OF CHINESE SUBJECTS |
| |
| Guo Dejun,Zhang Biyin.THE SEMANTIC DIFFERENTIAL PLACEMENT OF ATTRIBUTIONS AND DIMENSIONS IN FOUR DIFFERENT GROUPS OF CHINESE SUBJECTS[J].Psychological Science,1993(3). |
| |
| Authors: | Guo Dejun Zhang Biyin |
| |
| Abstract: | The purpose of our study was to validateChinese subjects'classification of 10 attribu-tions(mood,skill,knowledge,chance,efforthelp,ability,task,bias,luck)according todimensions of locus,stability,controllabi-lity,predictability and globality,and com-pare it with the results obtained from Ameri-can subjects by Chandler and Spies in 1980.The results showed that the agreement ofclassification between the Chinese and Amer-ican subjects was 62%.In addition,none ofthe attributions were rated at the extremes ofthe five dimensions(i.e.rated at 1.0-2.0 or6.0-7.0). |
| |
| Keywords: | Attribution Dimension Classification |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
|
