首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


The Twofold Assumption: A Response to Cole-Turner,Moritz, Peters and Peterson
Authors:Niels Henrik Gregersen
Affiliation:1. nhg@teol.ku.dk
Abstract:Abstract

The article discusses points and perspectives offered by the four respondents to the R.J. Russell Fellow Lectures for 2013/14. Joshua M. Moritz and Ron Cole-Turner bring in new material from biblical and patristic traditions relevant for the proposal of deep incarnation. How does the concept of deep incarnation fare in relation to tradition and science? Ted Peters and Daniel J. Peterson raise questions about the compatibility between a compatibilist view of divine action and creaturely freedom on the one hand, and ideas of kenosis on the other. Which models of kenosis models are workable, and which forms of compatibilism?
Keywords:Ron Cole-Turner  Joshua M. Moritz  Ted Peters  Daniel J. Peterson  Deep incarnation  Soteriological universalism  Logos-sarx Christology  Compatibilism  Divine action  Models of kenosis
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号