Sun,Wind, Rock and Metal: Attitudes toward Renewable and Non-renewable Energy Sources in the Context of Climate Change and Current Energy Debates |
| |
Authors: | Marci R. Culley Adam D. Carton Scott R. Weaver Emma Ogley-Oliver Jalika C. Street |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Department of Psychology, Georgia State University, P.O. Box 5010, Atlanta, GA 30302-5010, USA |
| |
Abstract: | Current energy debates are often framed in terms of the extent to which energy sources may mitigate global climate change (GCC) and facilitate energy independence (EI). However, little is understood about whether and how attitudes towards GCC and EI influence attitudes toward energy sources. Our study included 277 undergraduate students enrolled in introductory psychology classes at a large, Southeastern university. As hypothesized, results from ordinal and binary logistic regression analyses revealed that the likelihood participants would support the use of solar, wind, coal or nuclear energy decreased as a function of their belief that an energy source contributed to GCC. The belief that an energy source contributed to EI increased participants’ likelihood of support. Results suggest that beliefs about GCC and EI are important to determining support for energy sources and will likely contribute to effective marketing strategies and efforts to implement more environmentally-sustainable behavior and energy policy. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|