Replies to Selim Berker and Karl Schafer |
| |
Authors: | Anil Gupta |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Department of Philosophy, Cathedral of Learning 1001, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA |
| |
Abstract: | I respond to six objections, raised by Selim Berker and Karl Schafer, against the theory offered in my Empiricism and Experience: (1) that the theory needs a problematic notion of subjective character of experience; (2) that the transition from the hypothetical to the categorical fails because of a logical difficulty; (3) that the constraints imposed on admissible views are too weak; (4) that the theory does not deserve the label ‘empiricism’; (5) that the motivations provided for the Reliability constraint are insufficient; and (6) that convergence is bound to fail since epistemic entitlements are permissions. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|