首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

医学伦理学和生命伦理学学科定位再探析
引用本文:丛亚丽. 2020. 医学伦理学和生命伦理学学科定位再探析. 医学与哲学, 41(19): 1-4,11. doi: 10.12014/j.issn.1002-0772.2020.19.01
作者姓名:丛亚丽
作者单位:北京大学医学人文学院 北京 100191
基金项目:2018年教育部人文社会科学项目(18YJA720001)
摘    要:医学伦理学和生命伦理学谁包括谁看似很重要,但对于同作为应用伦理学这一角色来看,又无关紧要。医学伦理学更倾向于是医学的一部分,而生命伦理学则是一门新兴的交叉学科。学科定位问题涉及到谁需要定位以及为什么定位的问题,更涉及到定位需考虑的坐标问题。对学科定位的探讨还需要考虑其来源和历史,以及关注现阶段的主要影响因素。除此之外,对于这两个学科定位的再思考提示,应当认识其各自的独立性,而不应受定位问题的误导。

关 键 词:医学伦理学   生命伦理学   学科定位
收稿时间:2020-08-27
修稿时间:2020-09-18

Re-analysis on the Subject Orientation of Medical Ethics and Bioethics
CONG Ya-li. 2020. Re-analysis on the Subject Orientation of Medical Ethics and Bioethics. Medicine & Philosophy, 41(19): 1-4,11. doi: 10.12014/j.issn.1002-0772.2020.19.01
Authors:CONG Ya-li
Affiliation:School of Health Humanities, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China
Abstract:The question of "who covers who" seems important to medical ethics and bioethics, but it seems inessential when it comes to their roles in applied ethics. Medical ethics is affiliated to medicine, however, bioethics is an emerging multi-discipline. The author addresses that the issue of disciplinary/subject orientation involves more than who and why, but also the coordinates. To explore the orientation and position of a discipline, both the historical tracing and current impact factors are necessary. Moreover, the re-analysis on the two subjects orientation reminds us that, both medical ethics and bioethics have their own independence status, misleading caused by their discipline positioning should be avoided.
Keywords:medical ethics  bioethics  subject orientation
点击此处可从《医学与哲学(人文社会医学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《医学与哲学(人文社会医学版)》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号