首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

某三甲医院五年科研项目伦理审查情况分析
引用本文:王婧, 张辉, 李立, 王宇明. 2020. 某三甲医院五年科研项目伦理审查情况分析. 医学与哲学, 41(4): 28-30,39.
作者姓名:王婧  张辉  李立  王宇明
作者单位:河南省人民医院科研与学科建设部 河南郑州 450003
基金项目:2018年国家重点研发计划数字诊疗装备研发重点专项项目(2018YFC0114500)
摘    要:通过对国内某三甲医院五年科研伦理审查情况进行分析,探讨科研项目伦理审查工作的重点、难点及对策。汇总2013年~2017年经医学伦理委员会会议审查的科研项目,分析研究者的学历、职称、学科与通过率关系。近5年医学伦理委员会共审查科研项目285项,通过238项,未通过47项,其中内科通过率高于外科(P<0.05),副高以上职称通过率高于中级(P<0.05),研究生以上学历通过率高于本科及以下学历(P<0.05)。只有强化伦理意识,规范审查形式,健全监管机制,才能保证科研伦理工作健康规范发展。

关 键 词:伦理审查   伦理监管   科研伦理
收稿时间:2019-11-28
修稿时间:2020-01-10

Investigation on Ethical Review of Scientific Research in a Tertiary Hospital in the Last Five Years
WANG Jing, ZHANG Hui, LI Li, WANG Yu-ming. 2020. Investigation on Ethical Review of Scientific Research in a Tertiary Hospital in the Last Five Years. Medicine & Philosophy, 41(4): 28-30,39.
Authors:WANG Jing  ZHANG Hui  LI Li  WANG Yu-ming
Affiliation:Department of Scientific Research and Discipline Development, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou 450003, China
Abstract:This article examines the ethical review of scientific researches in a tertiary hospital in the last five years, with the analysis of the review contents, difficulties and strategies.The ethical reviews of scientific researches conducted by medical ethics committee of the hospital from 2013 to 2017 were collected, and the relationship between the investigator's degree, academic title, discipline and the approval rate were analyzed. In the last five years, the medical ethics committee had reviewed 285 scientific researches, 238 of which had passed and 47 of which had not passed. Among them, the passing rate of internal medicine was higher than that of surgery (P<0.05), the passing rate of investigators' with associate senior titles or above was higher than that of the intermediate level (P<0.05), and the passing rate of investigators' education level with post-graduation was higher than that of the under-graduation or below (P<0.05). Only by strengthening the awareness of ethics, standardizing the form of examination and improving the supervision mechanism can we ensure the sound and standard development of scientific research ethics.
Keywords:ethical review  ethical oversight  research ethics
点击此处可从《医学与哲学(人文社会医学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《医学与哲学(人文社会医学版)》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号