首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

多级语义量词对心理测量适合度的调查分析
引用本文:李亚红,胡文东,徐志鹏. 多级语义量词对心理测量适合度的调查分析[J]. 心理科学, 2005, 28(1): 175-177
作者姓名:李亚红  胡文东  徐志鹏
作者单位:第四军医大学军事医学心理学研究所,西安,710032
基金项目:全军面上基金课题(98M105),十五全军指令性课题(01L072)资助。
摘    要:为研究适合心理测量使用的语义量词等级数目而进行了本实验。实验采用自编《词义理解简明量表》,通过180名士兵对多级语义量词的区间赋值和点赋值,对不同等级语义量词模糊度进行了比较性研究。结果发现:(1)区间赋值范围与点赋值95%、99%可信区间无显著差异;(2)语义量词内序列蓑系与自然语言的序列关系基本一致,但词与词赋值区间并不完全等距;(3)三级与六级、七级语义量词的模糊度差异显著,六、七级语义量词模糊度高,在一定程度上不适合用于士兵心理测量。

关 键 词:多级语义量词 心理测量 序列关系 模糊度

An Analysis of Multi-grade Qualifiers' Adaptation to Psychological Testing
Li Yahong,Hu Wendong,Xu Zhipeng. An Analysis of Multi-grade Qualifiers' Adaptation to Psychological Testing[J]. Psychological Science, 2005, 28(1): 175-177
Authors:Li Yahong  Hu Wendong  Xu Zhipeng
Abstract:The main purpose of this study is to explore the optimal rating numbers of qualifiers in psychological testing. A concise questionnaire to comprehend semantic qualifiers was designed and employed in our experiment.180 private soldiers participated in the study. They was requested to designate values for intervals and points. Fuzziness-grade was analyzed in different rating qualifiers.Our results were that 1)There was no significant difference between values designated for intervals and 95%,99% Confidence Interval(CI). 2)The sequences of qualifiers were consistent with those of natural language.But the interval designating value between qualifiers was incompletely isometric.3)There were significant differences in fuzziness-grades between three points and six to seven points qualifiers.In our research we found there were high fuzziness-grades in six and seven points qualifiers.It was concluded that they did not adapt to psychological testing to a certain extent.
Keywords:psychological testing   qualifiers smantics   fuzziness-grade
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号