The relation between lisping and visual recognition memory in children

It was argued that if silent reading involves articulatory coding then children with a pronounced lisp ought to code two visual nonsense words such as RETH and RESS more similarly than children without a lisp. This, in tum, would lead to more false positives in a recognition memory task. Although the data confirmed this hypothesis, it turned out that lisping children made more correct positives (hits) as well. Lisping and normal children did not differ in sensitivity (d^′); therefore, the main result was a difference in criterion. An implausible hypothesis was offered so as to salvage a portion of the original argument.