The parallel-less Poggendorff: Virtual contours put the illusion down but not out

Four versions of Poggendorff displays were compared: (1) the conventional display of a transversal interrupted by parallel lines, (2) a transversals-only display, (3) a virtual-contour display where the parallels were suggested (but not drawn) via “good continuation” and “c1osure, ” and (4) the profile display, a degraded version of the virtual-contour display that retained many of its borders but did not suggest parallels. Each display was drawn with transversal tilted at 45 and 51 deg from vertical. All displays produced significant illusions at both tilts. By comparison with the illusion magnitudes of the conventional display, the effects for the other displays were small. The outcome supports the existence of two salient illusion-producing factors: the necessity for actual contours to form the subtended angle and assimilation of the transversal toward O’s horizontal.