首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Treatments for cigarette smoking: an evaluation of the contributions of aversion and counseling procedures
Authors:S T Tiffany  E M Martin  T B Baker
Institution:1. Department of Anaesthesia, University of Wisconsin, Madison, United States;2. Department of Critical Care Medicine, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom;3. Department of Pathology, Immunology & Lab Medicine, University of Florida, United States;4. Faculty of Medicine, Oxford University, United Kingdom;5. Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Brompton Hospital, United Kingdom;6. Department of Leukocyte Biology, Imperial College London, United Kingdom;7. Department of Anaesthetics, Intensive Care & Pain Medicine, Imperial College London, United Kingdom;8. Department of Anaesthetics, Intensive Care & Pain Medicine, Chelsea & Westminster Hospital, United Kingdom;9. Department of Anesthesia & Perioperative Care, University of California, San Francisco, United States;10. Manchester Collaborative Centre for Inflammation Research, Manchester, United Kingdom
Abstract:The role of aversive conditioning in rapid smoking was examined by randomly assigning smokers to one of three aversive treatments designed to induce three distinct levels of central malaise. These treatments, full-scale rapid smoking (FS; n = 22), truncated rapid smoking (TC: n = 20) and rapid puffing (RP; n = 20) were combined with a full-scale counseling package. A fourth treatment, full-scale rapid smoking with reduced counseling (RC; n = 20), was included to evaluate the contribution of coping response training to rapid-smoking efficacy. Among post-treatment measures of aversion, only heart rate (HR) response to cigarettes discriminated groups, with FS Ss exhibiting an apparent conditioned cardiac acceleration to cigarettes. Six-month follow-up data revealed that both the type of counseling and level of aversion had an impact on cigarette abstinence. At 6-months post-treatment, the FS group produced the best outcome, while the TC group and the RC group had the worst outcomes. The RP group was intermediate to these groups. Regression analysis showed that across all groups, confidence ratings of remaining abstinent were most predictive of outcome whereas within the two full-scale rapid-smoking treatments, post-treatment HR response to cigarettes was most predictive of latency to relapse. The results were discussed with respect to the contributions of aversion conditioning and full counseling to the success of aversive treatment packages for smoking cessation.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号