阅读预期对快速阅读理解的影响的实验研究

探讨阅读预期对快速阅读的理解水平与进程的影响。实验１探讨阅读预期对快速阅读理解水平的影响。阅读文章前分别给予被试正确、中性与误导的标题提示，结果表明，不同类型的标题提示对快速阅读的理解成绩有显著的影响，而对正常速度阅读的理解成绩影响效果不显著。实验２探讨阅读预期对快速阅读过程的词句加工程度的影响。结果表明，对优生来说，正确标题提示组发现文章中锗字的成绩显著低于误导标题提示组，差生的不同标题提示组发现错字的成绩差异不显著。两个实验的结果初步表明，快速阅读文章过程会更多地利用概念推动，较少地需要材料信息。

ON THE INFLUENCE OF READING ANTICPATION ON RAPID READING COMPREHENSION

This research probed into the influence of readinganticipation on the comprehensive level and the courseof rapid reading. In Experiment 1, the influence ofreading anticipation on the comprehensive level ofrapid reading was studied. Given respectively one ofthe three kinds of title suggestions i. e., right suggestion, neutral suggestion and misleading suggestion,the subjects were asked to read a narrative both topspeed and at ordinary speed. The results showed thatin the circumstance of rapid reading, different suggestions exerted significant effects on the achievement ofreading comprehension, and inthe circumstance of normal reading, the effects of different suggestions werenot significant. In Experiment 2, the result showedthat as far as the good readers were concerned, thegroup receiving the right suggestion found out muchmore wrong characters than the group receiving themisleading suggestion, and with regard to the poorreaders, the difference was not significant. On the basis of the results of the two experiments, it could beconcluded that in the course of rapid reading, the concept -- driving was more utilized and the material driving was less utilized.