The witch hunt as a structure of argumentation |
| |
Authors: | Douglas Walton |
| |
Institution: | (1) Department of Philosophy, University of Winnipeg, R3B 2E9 Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada |
| |
Abstract: | The concept of a witch hunt is frequently invoked, in recent times, to describe a kind of procedure for deciding the guilt of a person against whom an accusation has been made. But what exactly is a witch hunt? In this paper, ten conditions are formulated as a cluster of properties characterizing the witch hunt as a framework in which arguments are used: (1) pressure of social forces, (2) stigmatization, (3) climate of fear, (4) resemblance to a fair trial, (5) use of simulated evidence, (6) simulated expert testimony, (7) nonfalsifiability characteristic of evidence, (8) reversal of polarity, (9) non-openness, and (10) use of the loaded question technique. The witch hunt, as characterized by these criteria, is shown to function as a negative normative structure for evaluating argumentation used in particular cases. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|