Once More Unto the Breach: Type B Physicalism,Phenomenal Concepts,and the Epistemic Gap |
| |
Authors: | Janet Levin |
| |
Affiliation: | University of Southern California |
| |
Abstract: | Type B, or a posteriori, physicalism is the view that phenomenal-physical identity statements can be necessarily true, even though they cannot be known a priori—and that the key to understanding their status is to understand the special features of our phenomenal concepts, those concepts of our experiential states acquired through introspection. This view was once regarded as a promising response to anti-physicalist arguments that maintain that an epistemic gap between phenomenal and physical concepts entails that phenomenal and physical properties are distinct. More recently, however, many physicalists have lost confidence in the view, and have proposed less promising defences of physicalism—or have become outright sceptical about its prospects. I argue here that these physicalists have underestimated the resources of Type B physicalism and are thereby retreating too quickly—or fighting battles that have already been won. |
| |
Keywords: | Type B physicalism phenomenal concepts conceivability arguments epistemic gap |
|
|