首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Factor Indeterminacy as Metrological Uncertainty: Implications for Advancing Psychological Measurement
Authors:Edward E Rigdon  Jan-Michael Becker  Marko Sarstedt
Institution:1. Department of Marketing, Georgia State University;2. University of Cologne, Faculty of Management, Economics and Social Sciences, Cologne, Germany;3. Fakult?t für Wirtschaftswissenschaft, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg;4. School of Business and GA21, Monash University Malaysia
Abstract:Researchers have long been aware of the mathematics of factor indeterminacy. Yet, while occasionally discussed, the phenomenon is mostly ignored. In metrology, the measurement discipline of the physical sciences, uncertainty – distinct from both random error (but encompassing it) and systematic error – is a crucial characteristic of any measurement. This research argues that factor indeterminacy is uncertainty. Factor indeterminacy fundamentally threatens the validity of psychometric measurement, because it blurs the linkage between a common factor and the conceptual variable that the factor represents. Acknowledging and quantifying factor indeterminacy is important for progress in reducing this component of uncertainty in measurement, and thus improving psychological measurement over time. Based on our elaborations, we offer a range of recommendations toward achieving this goal.
Keywords:Structural equation modeling  factor indeterminacy  validity  measurement models
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号