情绪形容词词义的模糊赋值

353名大学生被试用模糊赋值方法对表示喜、怒、哀、惧四种基本情绪的48个形容词的强度和复杂度作语义经验赋值。结果表明：①强度和复杂度是两个不同的情绪评定维度，两者间的情绪形容词模糊语义赋值结果没有必然联系。②在强度和复杂度赋值上，各词的取值基本符合人们日常对这些词所表达情绪体验的理解，性别的量表值存在较大一致性。③男、女生在赋值上的差异主要表现在各词位次和把握度的不同，这种差异可能与性别差异的情绪经验及个体差异有关。④大学生情绪形容词模糊语义赋值的把握度总体上都较高，各词的语义在两个维度上都存在一定的模糊性。⑤根据各词强度赋值隶属度数据计算的模糊距离测度和Phi方关联测度得到了四类形容词相似的聚类分析结果。

FUZZY EVALUATION STATISTICS FOR EMOTIONAL ADJECTIVE SEMANTICS

353 undergraduates were asked to designate values experientially, using a method of fuzzy interval evaluation, to forty-eight adjectives of four kinds of basic emotions, that is, happy, anger, sad, and fear, according to their semantics on intensity and complexity separately. The results as below: first, intensity and complexity are two different dimensions for emotion evaluation and the results of semantic fuzzy evaluation to emotional adjectives on them are not necessarily related; secondly, the semantic fuzzy evaluation of both intensity and complexity are fundamentally consistent with the daily-life understanding of the emotional experience represented by those qualifiers, and the scale values from male subjects correlate very significantly to the results of their female counterparts; thirdly, the difference between the male and female on the evaluation basically lies in different ranks and certainties, which was ascribed to their different experiences on emotion and the individual differences among themselves respectively; fourthly, the certainties of the undergraduates' semantic fuzzy evaluation to the emotional adjectives were rather high as a whole, and the meaning of those adjectives are fuzzy on the two dimensions to some degree; And lastly, hierarchical clustering procedure was run with these four kinds of adjectives in terms of their fuzzy distance measure and phi-square measure computed by the degree of membership of intensity evaluation, and get to similar categories.