Another Look at Reputational Paths and Case Studies

Two studies are reported on effects of salience of identity (personal or group), comparison of performance (individual or intergroup), and dispositional self-esteem on originality of thinking. Study 1, with 169 participants, had a measure of algorithm use as the dependent variable. Significant main effect interactive effects of the predictors on algorithm use were observed. The second study had 369 participants, and a dependent measure of rated originality (novelty) of individuals' problem-solving ideas. A statistically significant three-way interaction of identity salience, comparison type, and self-esteem was observed on the originality scores. The pattern of the results across the two studies is interpreted as indicating dispositional differences in how specific situational influences on identity affect inclination toward use of algorithmic versus original problem-solving approaches. Both theoretical and applied implications of the results are offered.