The Impact of Performance-Contingent Rewards on Perceived Autonomy and Competence |
| |
Authors: | Nathalie Houlfort Richard Koestner Mireille Joussemet Amélie Nantel-Vivier Natasha Lekes |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) McGill University, Montreal, Canada;(2) Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts |
| |
Abstract: | Two studies examined the impact of performance-contingent rewards on perceived autonomy, competence, and intrinsic motivation. Autonomy was measured in terms of both decisional and affective reports. The first study revealed an undermining effect of performance-contingent rewards on affective reports of autonomy among university students, and an increase in reports of competence. Decisional autonomy judgements were unaffected by rewards. The second study replicated this pattern of findings among elementary school children. These results help resolve Cognitive Evaluation Theory's (E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan, 1985; R. M. Ryan, V. Mims, & R. Koestner, 1983) and Eisenberger, Rhoades, et al.'s (R. Eisenberger, L. Rhoades, & J. Cameron, 1999) divergent positions on the impact of performance-contingent rewards on autonomy. The studies also included measures of intrinsic motivation. |
| |
Keywords: | motivation rewards autonomy competence |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|