首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

Justice and Civic Friendship: An Aristotelian Critique of Modern Citizenry
引用本文:Rajesh C. Shukla. Justice and Civic Friendship: An Aristotelian Critique of Modern Citizenry[J]. Frontiers of Philosophy in China, 2014, 9(1): 1-20. DOI: 10.3868/s030-003-014-0001-6
作者姓名:Rajesh C. Shukla
摘    要:Modem moral and political theorists make a sharp separation between justice and civic friendship, arguing that justice deals with the fair terms of co-operation in the social sphere whereas civic friendship is about an individual's contingent affections in the political domain. In addition, they also argue that the principles of justice must determine the nature and function of civic friendship in modem liberal society. Even though the historical origin of the above view can be traced to the writings of Immanuel Kant (2007), John Rawls provides us with its most cogent formulation in recent times. In his book A Theory of Justice (1971), Rawls argues that the considerations of right are prior to the considerations of good; therefore the principles of justice must determine the limits of civic friendship. Against RaMs, I argue that justice and civic friendship are intrinsically connected and that they cannot be separated in experience. I draw upon Aristotle's theory of virtue to strengthen my arguments. Following Aristotle, I show that both justice and friendship are virtues and that all virtues hold together. The Aristotelian coherence of virtues, I argue, can be useful in redefining the obligations of justice and civic friendship in contemporary liberal democracies.

关 键 词:亚里士多德  正义  公民  批判  历史渊源  民间  说服力  美德

Justice and Civic Friendship: An Aristotelian Critique of Modern Citizenry
Rajesh C. Shukla. Justice and Civic Friendship: An Aristotelian Critique of Modern Citizenry[J]. Frontiers of Philosophy in China, 2014, 9(1): 1-20. DOI: 10.3868/s030-003-014-0001-6
Authors:Rajesh C. Shukla
Affiliation:School of Public Ethics, Saint Paul University, Ottawa K1S 1C4, Canada
Abstract:Modern moral and political theorists make a sharp separation between justice and civic friendship, arguing that justice deals with the fair terms of co-operation in the social sphere whereas civic friendship is about an individual’s contingent affections in the political domain. In addition, they also argue that the principles of justice must determine the nature and function of civic friendship in modern liberal society. Even though the historical origin of the above view can be traced to the writings of Immanuel Kant (2007), John Rawls provides us with its most cogent formulation in recent times. In his book A Theory of Justice (1971), Rawls argues that the considerations of right are prior to the considerations of good; therefore the principles of justice must determine the limits of civic friendship. Against Rawls, I argue that justice and civic friendship are intrinsically connected and that they cannot be separated in experience. I draw upon Aristotle’s theory of virtue to strengthen my arguments. Following Aristotle, I show that both justice and friendship are virtues and that all virtues hold together. The Aristotelian coherence of virtues, I argue, can be useful in redefining the obligations of justice and civic friendship in contemporary liberal democracies.
Keywords:justice   virtue   civic friendship   Aristotle   John Rawls   modemcitizenship
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《Frontiers of Philosophy in China》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《Frontiers of Philosophy in China》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号