首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Speed of reasoning and its relation to reasoning ability
Authors:Frank Goldhammer  Rinke H. Klein Entink
Affiliation:1. German Institute for International Educational Research (DIPF), Germany;2. University of Twente, Netherlands;1. Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Austria;2. Leibniz Institute for Research and Information in Education (DIPF), Frankfurt am Main, Germany;3. Centre for International Student Assessment (ZIB), Munich, Germany;1. Key Laboratory of Surficial Geochemistry, Ministry of Education, School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China;2. Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute, Nanjing, China;1. University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg;2. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, France
Abstract:The study investigates empirical properties of reasoning speed which is conceived as the fluency of solving reasoning problems. Responses and response times in reasoning tasks are modeled jointly to clarify the covariance structure of reasoning speed and reasoning ability. To determine underlying abilities, the predictive validities of two cognitive covariates, namely perceptual and executive attention, are investigated. A sample of N = 230 test takers completed a reasoning test, Advanced Progressive Matrices (APM), and attention tests indicating perceptual and executive attention. For modeling responses the two-parameter normal ogive model, and for modeling response times the two-parameter lognormal model was applied. Results suggest that reasoning speed is a unidimensional construct representing significant individual differences, and that reasoning speed and ability are negatively correlated but clearly distinguishable constructs. Perceptual and executive attention showed differential effects on reasoning speed and reasoning ability, i.e., reasoning speed is explained by executive attention only, while reasoning ability is explained by both covariates. Implications for the assessment of reasoning are discussed.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号