Shaming in and into Argumentation |
| |
Authors: | Beth Innocenti Manolescu |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Department of Communication Studies, University of Kansas, Bailey Hall, Room 102, 1440 Jayhawk Blvd., Lawrence, KS 66045, USA |
| |
Abstract: | Shame appeals may be both relevant to and make possible argumentation with reluctant addressees. I propose a normative pragmatic model of practical reasoning involved in shame appeals and show that its explanatory power exceeds that of a more traditional account of an underlying practical inference structure. I also illustrate that analyzing the formal propriety of shame appeals offers a more complete explanation of their normative pragmatic force than an application of rules for dialogue types. |
| |
Keywords: | shame appeals normative pragmatics pragma-dialectics ad populum tactics tu quoque tactics Carrie Chapman Catt |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|