首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Weighing the Evidence: Empirical Assessment and Ethical Implications of Conversion Therapy
Authors:Robert J. Cramer  Frank D. Golom  Charles T. LoPresto  Shalene M. Kirkley
Affiliation:1. University of Alabama;2. Teachers College, Columbia University;3. Loyola College in Maryland
Abstract:The American Psychological Association's (APA's) as well as other professional organizations' (e.g., American Psychiatric Association) removal of homosexuality as a mental disorder represented a paradigmatic shift in thinking about exual orientation. Since then, APA (2000) American Psychiatric Association. 2000. Position statement on attempts to change sexual orientation (conversion and reparative therapies).. American Journal of Psychiatry, 157: 17191721. [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] [Google Scholar] disseminated guidelines for working with lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) clients, and a variety of scholars and researchers alike have advocated affirmative therapeutic interventions with LGB individuals. Despite these efforts, the controversy over treating individuals with LGB orientations using nonaffirmative techniques continues. In this discussion, the limited evidence regarding the efficacy and effects of conversion therapy is surveyed, particularly in the context of empirically supported treatment criteria summarized by Division 12 (clinical psychology) of the APA. Authors then consider the resulting ethical considerations in performing conversion therapy and propose alternative uses of affirmative therapy on the basis of ethical standards defined by APA. Finally, options for treating LGB individuals who are coming to terms with their sexual orientations are discussed.
Keywords:conversion therapy  affirmative therapy  evidence-based treatment  sexual orientation  ethical treatment
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号