首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

源于“反常”终于“常理”的禀赋效应
引用本文:李海虹,邓州,何欣,申劭婧,邹雅雯,朱敏帆,王芸,谢晓非. 源于“反常”终于“常理”的禀赋效应[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(3): 394-405. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2019.00394
作者姓名:李海虹  邓州  何欣  申劭婧  邹雅雯  朱敏帆  王芸  谢晓非
作者单位:北京大学心理与认知科学学院, 行为与心理健康北京市重点实验室, 北京 100871
基金项目:* 国家自然科学基金资助(71772007);* 国家自然科学基金资助(71472005);* 国家自然科学基金资助(91224002)
摘    要:如果忽略收入影响和交易成本, 愿意为一样物品支付的价格应等于愿意出售的价格。而塞勒教授却发现, 现实生活中有一些“反常”现象, 个体会对自己所拥有的物品赋予更高的价值, 造成“愿意支付价格”和“愿意出售价格”的不一致。塞勒利用预期理论中的损失厌恶对这些反常现象进行解释, 并将该现象称为禀赋效应(endowment effect)。此后, 众多研究者从不同角度对该效应进行了探索和论证。文章详细梳理了禀赋效应的多种解释机制, 包括损失厌恶、心理所有权理论、偏差的认知过程以及进化的观点等, 论证了禀赋效应符合“常理”的原因, 同时也探讨了禀赋效应在商业销售策略和政府拆迁政策等方面的应用前景。

关 键 词:禀赋效应  损失厌恶  心理所有权  认知偏差  心理学  经济学  
收稿时间:2018-03-29

Normality rather than anomaly: The theory and application of endowment effect
LI Haihong,DENG Zhou,HE Xin,SHEN Shaojing,ZOU Yawen,ZHU Minfan,WANG Yun,XIE Xiaofei. Normality rather than anomaly: The theory and application of endowment effect[J]. Advances In Psychological Science, 2019, 27(3): 394-405. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2019.00394
Authors:LI Haihong  DENG Zhou  HE Xin  SHEN Shaojing  ZOU Yawen  ZHU Minfan  WANG Yun  XIE Xiaofei
Affiliation:School of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences and Beijing Key Laboratory of Behavior and Mental Health, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Abstract:If the influence of income and trade cost were neglected, it is natural that people are willing to pay the same for something as they would require when sell it. However, Prof. Thaler discovered that it is not always the truth. It happens in daily life that individuals attach higher value to the things they own and thus their willingness to pay and willingness to sell for the very item may differ. Enlightened by the prospect theory, Thaler explained this anomaly by loss aversion and named it endowment effect. Following him, many researchers have made further exploration and argument from various angles. In this paper, we summarized previous work about endowment effect and list different explanations including loss aversion theory, psychological ownership theory, biased cognitive processing theory and evolution theory. This paper elaborated the interrelationship and disputes among the theories and finally gave the reason why endowment effect is not abnormal. Meanwhile, endowment effect plays an important role in guiding government work as well as business strategy making. Future research should enrich the theory framework, expand applications and strengthen the research in Chinese background.
Keywords:endowment effect  loss aversion  ownership effect  cognitive bias  psychology  economics  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《心理科学进展》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《心理科学进展》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号